Edgar Cayce's Japan prediction and other prophecy's

Although out by a few years here and there Edgar Cayce's predictions seem to be gaining more and more credibility by the day. Here is an article on Edgar Cayce who claimed he could see into the Akashic Records.A library of what will be in the future

I personally don't believe in the Akashic Records after studiying some of Einstien's relativity theory which seemed to make much more sense to me and indicates it is not possible for us to live in a clockwork universe or a pre-determined life pattern. I will simplify the theory in another post for you to make up your own mind.

My personal beliefs and the prophecy's of Edgar cayce are total opposite ends of a scale but even i think some of his predictions are a little too accurate for guesswork. It's strange to say the least.



Edgar Cayce's Predictions
This article deals with Edgar Cayce's Predictions for the coming changes to our planet. I'm using the term predictions instead of prophecies for 2 reasons: 1. Predictions are more something that a psychic predicts will happen and not always does, and 2. For some reason people search for Edgar Cayce's Predictions twice as much as they do for Edgar Cayce's Prophecies... Either way, we're still dealing with Edgar Cayce and what his sub-conscious mind says will involve a pole shift and a huge change to the earth some would call Armageddon.
The Sleeping Prophet
Edgar Cayce was known as "the sleeping prophet." He would go into a hypnotic trance in which he gave thousands of readings on different people. These dealt with past lives (including Atlantis), medical help and prophecies/predictions for the future. While not all of Edgar Cayce's predictions came true, a good majority of them did. He was dead-on when it came to most of the medical remedies he gave and doctors and scientists could never explain it. What Edgar Cayce was doing was tapping into the Akashic Records - a sort of library of everything residing in the higher planes. For more on any of that, you might want to check out the Dreams & OBE's section. I'm also going to leave the Edgar Cayce biography for another place since this section deals with Armageddon and this article could get a little lengthy.
Edgar Cayce's Predictions of Armageddon
Several of his readings spoke of coming cataclysms. Some of these did not come true but quite a few did. Even some of the major Doomsday predictions Cayce made have not come true decades after their supposed time. The growing concensus amongst doomsdayers is that something is going to occur on or around Dec. 21, 2012. Could Edgar Cayce's predictions be off by a generation or two? There seem to be a lot of other sources predicting something major about to happen.
Cayce On Pole Shifts
When it comes to Cayce and pole shifts, he first mentions them 10,500,000 years ago, when the polar regions were tropical and the oceans were "turned about."
In the first, or that known as the beginning, or in the Caucasian and Carpathian, or the Garden of Eden, in that land which lies now much in the desert, yet much in mountain and much in the rolling lands there. The extreme northern portions were then the southern portions, or the polar regions were then turned to where they occupied more of the tropical and semitropical regions; hence it would be hard to discern or disseminate the change. The Nile entered into the Atlantic Ocean. What is now the Sahara was an inhabited land and very fertile. What is now the central portion of this country, or the Mississippi basin, was then all in the ocean; only the plateau was existent, or the regions that are now portions of Nevada, Utah, and Arizona formed the greater part of what we know as the United States. That (land) along the Atlantic seaboard formed the outer portion then, or the lowlands of Atlantis. The Andean or the Pacific coast of South America occupied then the extreme western portion of Lemuria. The Urals and the northern region of same were turned into a tropical land. The desert in the Mongolian land was then the fertile portion. This may enable you to form some concept of the status of the earth's representations at that time! The oceans were then turned about....
Arctic and Tropical Climates Switch Places
In another reading, Cayce says:
...the variations (in Atlantis), as we find, extend over a period of some two hundred thousand years...and that there were many changes in the surface of what is now called the earth. In the first or greater portion, we find that now known as the southern portions of South America and the Arctic or North regions, while those in what is now Siberia - or that as of Hudson Bay - was rather in that region of the tropics or that position now occupied by near what would be as the same line would run, of the southern Pacific or central Pacific regions - and about the same way. Then we find, with this change that came first in that portion, when the first of those peoples used that as prepared for the changes in the earth we stood near in the same position as the earth occupies in the present - as to Capricorn, or the equator, or the poles. Then with that portion, then the South Pacific, or Lemuria, began its disappearance - even before Atlantis....
Was Cayce's Prediction Wrong or Did It Just Begin?
Cayce makes a couple more mentions of the pole shifts. When talking of future problems, he only brings it up a few times over the many years he gave readings. They are wide-spread and not very precise.
...begins in '58 and ends when the changes wrought in the upheavals and the shifting of the poles, as begins then the reign in '98.
As to the changes physical again: The earth will be broken up in the western portion of America. The greater portion of Japan must go into the sea. The upper portion of Europe will be changed as in the twinkling of an eye. Land will appear off the east coast of America. There will be the upheavals in the Arctic and in the Antarctic that will make for eruption of volcanoes in the Torrid areas, and there will be the shifting then of the poles - so that where there has been those of a frigid or the semitropical will become the more tropical, and moss and fern will grow. And these will begin those periods in '58 to '98, when these will be proclaimed as the periods when His light will be seen again in the clouds.

Gradual, Not Cataclysmic
Question: What great change or the beginning of what change, if any, is to take place in the earth in the year 2000 to 2001 A.D.?
Answer (Cayce): When there is a shifting of the poles. Or a new cycle begins.
Question: Will it cause a sudden convulution and about what year?
Answer: In 1998 we may find a great deal of the activities as have been wrought by the gradual changes that are caoming about... (at) the change between the Piscean and the Aquarian age. This is a gradual, not a cataclysmic activity in the experience of the earth in this period.

These (national boundary shifts in Europe) will not come as we find, as broken, before the catastrophes of outside forces to the earth in '36, which will come from the shifting of the equilibrium of the earth itself in space, with those of the consequential effects upon the various portions of the country - or world - affected by same.

Question: What will be the type and extent of the upheaval in '36?
Answer: The wars, the upheavals in the interior of the earth and the shifting of same by the differentiation in the axis as respecting the positions for the Polaris center.

Reminded of Atlantis
Other prophecies for our future refer to Atlantis:
Poseidia will be among the first portions of Atlantis to rise again - expect it '68 and '69 - not so far away.
Obviously, Atlantis hasn't risen yet, but portions of underwater structures began appearing around that time as technology became better and news spread faster. The Bimini Road was discovered around this time, I believe.

...in Atlantis in the period of the first upheavals and destruction that came to the land, as must in the next generation to come to other land.
Question: How soon will the changes in the earth's activity begin to be apparent?
Answer: When there is the first breaking-up of some conditions in the South Sea (South Pacific), and those as apparent in the sinking or arising of that which is almost opposite to it, or in the Mediterranean, and the Aetna (Etna?) area. Then we may know it has begun.

Question: Will there be any physical changes in the earth's surface in North America? If so, what sections will be affected, and how?
Answer: All over the country we will find many physical changes of a minor or greater degree. The greater change, as we will find, in America, will be the North Atlantic Seaboard. Watch New York!"

Something To Back Cayce Up
I can't find it for the life of me, but I have a book by Bruce Goldberg titled "Past Lives, Future Lives." It's a book full of hypnotherapy sessions. There's one session in particular I wanted to mention here. It deals with someone's future life referring back to the devastation around the "beginning of the century." New York will be destroyed and a new city will be formed - York. If I ever find the book I'll write another section just for that.
Update - I found the book (3 months later) and have a new article about it HERE. They actually change the name to New City and it could be a later date than I said, but you'll see if you read it.

Where Not To Be When The Time Comes
The previous answer continues:
As to conditions in the geography of the world, of the country, changes here are gradually coming about. Many portions of the east coast will be disturbed, as well as many portions of the west coast, as well as the central portion of the United States.
In the next few years, lands will appear in the Atlantic as well as in the Pacific. And what is the coast line now of many a land will be bed of the ocean. Even many of the battlefields of the present (1941) will be ocean, will be the seas, the bays, the lands over which the new order will carry on their trade as one with another.
Portions of the now east coast of New York, or New York City itself, will in the main disappear. This will be another generation, though, here; while the southern portions of Carolina, Georgia, these will disappear. This will be much sooner.
The waters of the lakes (Great Lakes) will empty into the Gulf (of Mexico), rather than the waterway over which such discussions have been recently made... (St. Lawrence Seaway).
Then the area where the entity is now located (Virginia Beach) will be among the safety lands - as will be portions of what is now Ohio, Indiana and Illinois and much of the southern portion of Canada and the eastern portion of Canada; while the western land, much of that is to be disturbed in this land, as, of course, much in other lands.
The earth will be broken up in many places. The early portion will see a change in the physical aspect of the west coast of America. There will be open waters in the northern portion of Greenland. There will be new lands seen off the Carribean Sea and dry land will appear - South America shall be shaken from the uppermost portion to the end, and in the Antarctic off Tierra Del Fuego, land, and a strait with rushing waters.
Are Edgar Cayce's Predictions Under Way
When you think of the natural disasters that have happened in the last few years, the more these readings begin to seem real. When Cayce's readings mention the South Sea, think of the earthquakes that have been going on. The main one that pops to mind is the deadly Christmas tsunami of 2004. Then you have hurricane Katrina and New Orleans. New Orleans has already been under water once and it's still sinking. Who's to say another hurricane won't put it under completely. Then there's New York. If the oceans rise it will have nowhere to go. The west coast? That's a completely different story. Another great earthquake is due any time. Who knows if that will be the one to break the continent in two and send California for a swim?
No matter what the outcome turns out to be, we can only wait to find out if Edgar Cayce's Predictions will come true. And so I leave you after this very loooooong article. The readings are courtesy of the A.R.E. with books by John White, Edgar Evans Cayce and W.H. Church as reference.